In software engineering, ensuring the reliability and functionality of applications is important. One key aspect of this process is testing, which comes in different types. In this blog, we will cover all the aspects of white box testing. You will learn about the types and best practices of white box testing in software engineering. Moreover, you will get to know the advantages and disadvantages of this testing technique.
Table of Contents
To learn about software testing in detail, check out this video by Intellipaat:
What is White Box Testing in Software Engineering?
White-box testing is also referred to as clear box testing, glass box testing, transparent box testing, or structural testing. It is a software testing approach that involves a detailed examination of the internal structures and mechanisms of a software application. Testers know the source code and design test cases to explore different paths, conditions, and branches within the codebase. The primary objective is to achieve complete code coverage, ensuring that every line of code is tested. This methodology allows for the early detection of issues such as logical errors, incorrect calculations, or variable misuse.
Advance in Software Engineering with the help of the Software Engineering and Application Development Course!
Types of White Box Testing
White-box testing exists in various types to cover code comprehensively. Some common types of white box testing are as follows:
- Unit Testing: It involves testing each component or module of the software. It ensures that each unit works as expected. This helps identify any issues early in the development process. For example, if you are developing a car, unit testing will include testing each part of the car separately to make sure that it works fine.
- Loop Testing: This test focuses on testing loops like while, for, or do-while. We check if the ending conditions are working correctly and if the loop size is sufficient. To handle extensive loops, developers write a unit test program that mimics the source code and tests multiple cycles. The challenge arises when there are changes or bugs; traditionally, developers need to modify and retest each part, slowing the release.
- Condition Testing: Evaluate the different decision statement conditions, including simple and compound conditions. It checks logical conditions for both true and false values. For instance, testing an “if” condition for true and false outcomes. This ensures that the program functions correctly under various logical scenarios, providing a thorough evaluation.
- Data Flow Testing: Errors are typically found when variables that are not defined are being used in the program or initialized variables are neglected. The method scrutinizes the control flow of programs, focusing on the sequence of variables and their values throughout events. The key goal is to locate where values are assigned to variables and used in the program. By addressing both points, data flow testing ensures a thorough examination of data flow.
- Integration Testing: It tests interactions between different components or modules to ensure they work together seamlessly. To detect defects that may arise during the integration of various units and verify the correct functioning of the integrated system.
For example, in an e-commerce site, integration testing ensures smooth interaction between independent modules such as user profiles, products, and shopping carts.
- Regression Testing: This involves retesting modified parts of the codebase to ensure that new changes do not negatively impact existing functionality. To verify that recent code modifications have not introduced new defects or affected the reliability of previously tested features, for example, if word processing software undergoes an update, we will use regression testing to retest previous features like formatting, spell-checking, and document saving after implementing the new code.
- Path Testing: It involves creating flow graphs representing the program’s flow and testing all independent paths. This means checking each route through the program to ensure it works correctly. For instance, if there’s a path from the main part of the program to a function, we set the parameters, test it, and fix any issues. The goal is to validate that all possible paths through the code have been tested, reducing the likelihood of undiscovered issues.
- Testing from the Perspective of Memory (Size): Sometimes, the size of the code may be unnecessarily large. This may happen because there is no code reusability. For example, consider there are 5 different blocks of code written for software. The first 15 lines of each block are the same. Now, these 15 lines could be written in a separate function and made available to all those 5 blocks. It would save a lot of memory space. For example, if the developer has created a file of size 200kb, by reusing the code, it can be reduced to 100 kb.
Another case may be that the developer has created unnecessary functions and variables that are not used in any part of the code. This also leads to an increase in the memory size occupied by the program. To eliminate such scenarios, this testing is done.
Check out the Software Development Courses to become a Certified Software Developer.
White Box Testing Techniques
Different techniques in white-box testing cater to specific needs such as code coverage, complexity analysis, fault detection, and security assessment. These techniques in white box testing are mentioned in detail below:
Statement Coverage
It is a white-box testing approach that focuses on ensuring that every statement is traversed at least once during testing. Here, a statement refers to a single line of code in a programming language. Test cases are created to go through each statement in the source code, aiming to detect any portions of code that remain unexecuted. The goal is to develop a set of test cases that guarantees the execution of all individual statements within the program.
During statement coverage, each block of statements is targeted to ensure that all paths within these blocks are executed. This not only assures the execution of every statement but also validates the coverage of basic blocks. Moreover, statement coverage also ensures that all feasible paths through the program are tested. This integration of statement coverage with path coverage offers a more detailed evaluation of the software, identifying potential logical errors and enhancing the overall reliability of the codebase.
The formula to calculate statement coverage in software engineering is
Branch Coverage
Branch coverage is also known as decision coverage or condition coverage. This testing method is designed to test decision points within software code and to verify all potential outputs of decision points. These decision points are called branches. For example, in an if-else statement, the two possible outcomes, i.e., true or false, are the branches.
It is the main element of decision coverage, which ensures that each branch, indicating true and false outcomes of conditional statements, is thoroughly tested. This guarantees that every logical path is traversed at least once, leaving no untested routes.
The formula to calculate branch coverage is:
Loop Coverage
This technique is used for testing loops within a software application to ensure their correct functionality under different scenarios. It covers both simple and nested loop structures. In simple loop coverage, the focus is on testing loops with simple structures, such as ‘for’ or ‘while’ loops that iterate a fixed number of times. Test cases are created to test the loop’s boundary conditions, ensuring it behaves as expected during the specified number of iterations. Nested loop coverage extends this testing approach to loops within other loops, exploring interactions and combinations of multiple loops. To ensure that the program behaves correctly when dealing with the complexities introduced by nested loops, test cases are created to evaluate various loop combinations between inner and outer loops.
For example, in a program that has a nested ‘while’ loop that is processing each element of an array and a ‘for’ loop that is iterating through the array, nested loop coverage explores the interactions between the ‘for’ and ‘while’ loops, taking into account different loop conditions and guaranteeing correct control flow.
Process of White Box Testing
White box testing is performed after the completion of the Software Development Life Cycle. The process of white box testing involves a series of systematic steps that start with input such as requirements, functional specifications, design documents, and the source code itself. The following is a breakdown of each phase in the white box testing process:
Input
Requirements, Functional Specifications, Design Documents, Source Code: Gather all relevant documents, including requirements, functional specifications, design documents, and the source code of the software under test. These documents provide the foundation for understanding the expected behavior and internal structure of the application.
Processing
Performing Risk Analysis: Conduct a thorough risk analysis to identify potential areas of concern and guide the testing process. This involves assessing the complexity of the code, potential points of failure, and areas that may be prone to defects. The goal is to prioritize testing efforts based on the identified risks.
Planning
Proper Test Planning: Develop a detailed test plan that outlines the testing strategy, scope, objectives, resources, and schedule. This plan serves as a roadmap for the testing process and ensures that testing efforts are aligned with project goals.
Designing Test Cases:
Based on the gathered documentation, design test cases that systematically cover the entire codebase. Test cases should include scenarios that evaluate different branches, conditions, loops, and statements within the code. These test cases are created to ensure that all aspects of the code are tested thoroughly.
Executing Test Cases:
Execute the designed test cases on the software. Monitor and record the results, including any discrepancies between the expected and actual outcomes. The iterative process of executing test cases and refining them is crucial to identify and address potential defects.
Repeat Until Error-Free Software:
Iterate through the testing process, refining test cases and re-executing them until the software is error-free. This iterative approach ensures that the software is rigorously tested and refined.
Output
Preparing Final Report:
Create a final report summarizing the entire white box testing process. This report includes details about the testing activities, test results, identified defects, their resolutions, and recommendations for future testing or development efforts. The final report serves as documentation for the testing process and aids in knowledge transfer within the team.
Get ready for your interview by going through our Software Engineering Interview Questions blog.
White Box Testing Example
Let’s consider a simple example to illustrate white box testing. Suppose we have a function written in a programming language that calculates the area of a rectangle. The function is as follows:
def calculate_rectangle_area(length, width):
if length > 0 and width > 0:
area = length * width
return area
else:
return "Invalid input: Length and width must be positive numbers."
In this example, we’ll perform white box testing on the ‘calculate_rectangle_area’ function. Different test cases will be applied, as shown below:
Test Case 1: Valid Inputs
Input: Length = 5, Width = 8
Expected Output: 40 (calculated as 5 * 8)
Test Case 2: Invalid Input (Negative Length)
Input: Length = -5, Width = 8
Expected Output: “Invalid input: Length and width must be positive numbers.”
Test Case 3: Invalid Input (Zero Width)
Input: Length = 10, Width = 0
Expected Output: “Invalid input: Length and width must be positive numbers.”
Test Case 4: Valid Inputs (Floating-Point Numbers)
Input: Length = 4.5, Width = 3.2
Expected Output: 14.4 (calculated as 4.5 * 3.2)
Test Case 5: Valid Inputs (Minimum Values)
Input: Length = 1, Width = 1
Expected Output: 1 (calculated as 1 * 1)
Test Case 6: Valid Inputs (Maximum Values)
Input: Length = 1000, Width = 500
Expected Output: 500000 (calculated as 1000 * 500)
In this example, we design test cases to cover different scenarios, including valid inputs, invalid inputs, floating-point numbers, and extreme values. The focus is on ensuring that all code paths, including the conditions within the function, are tested. The white box testing process involves analyzing the internal logic of the function and executing test cases to ensure their correctness. If any issues are identified during testing, they can be addressed by the development team.
Tools for White Box Testing
Many tools are available for conducting white-box testing across different programming environments. In Java, popular tools include JUnit, Mockito, Eclipse, and IntelliJ IDEA, providing support for unit testing and mock object creation. In the .NET ecosystem, NUnit, Selenium WebDriver, and Visual Studio are commonly used for testing applications. Moreover, open-source tools such as Selenium, Cucumber, Pytest, and Appium offer options for white-box testing, supporting different programming languages, and enabling automation across diverse platforms.
Difference Between White Box, Black Box, and Gray Box Testing
Some of the differences between White Box, Black Box, and Gray Box Testing are given below:
| White Box Testing | Black Box Testing | Gray Box Testing |
| Involves examining the internal logic, structure, and code of a software application. | The focus is on testing the functionality against specified requirements. | The purpose of the grey box testing is to look for any defects that may have resulted from improper application usage or improper structure. |
| The tester knows the internal workings of the system. | The tester does not know the internal code. | The tester has limited knowledge of the internal code. |
| Test cases are designed based on the internal code structure. | Test cases are designed based on input-output specifications and functional requirements. | Test cases are designed based on a combination of input-output specifications and knowledge of internal logic. |
| It is concerned with ensuring that all paths and branches of the code are tested. | It is concerned with validating that the software behaves as expected. | It aims to combine the strengths of both white-box and black-box testing. |
| It does not provide resilience and security against viral attacks. | Ensures resilience and security against viral attacks. | It does not provide resilience and security against viral attacks. |
Advantages and Disadvantages of White Box Testing
White box testing has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. Those are listed below.
Advantages of White Box Testing
1. Thorough Coverage
White box testing ensures comprehensive coverage of the internal code, including all paths, branches, and conditions. This leads to a higher likelihood of identifying potential issues. Since testers have access to the internal logic, white box testing can help uncover hidden errors, logical flaws, and coding mistakes that may not be apparent from an external perspective.
2. Optimized Code Performance
White box testing allows for the optimization of code performance by identifying inefficient code segments, redundant functions, or areas where code execution can be improved.
3. Effective Unit Testing
White box testing is particularly effective for unit testing, ensuring that each component of the software functions as intended. This level of granularity helps in isolating and fixing issues at an early stage.
4. Early Detection of Defects
White box testing is typically conducted during the development phase, allowing for the early detection and resolution of defects. This contributes to a more efficient and cost-effective development process.
Disadvantages of White Box Testing
1. Requires Programming Knowledge
Testers need a deep understanding of programming languages and the internal code structure, which may not be feasible for all members of a testing team. This reliance on programming expertise can limit the availability of qualified testers.
2. Time-Consuming
White box testing can be time-consuming, especially when dealing with large and complex codebases. Designing test cases that cover all possible code paths requires a significant investment of time and effort.
3. Limited Validation of User Experience
White box testing mainly focuses on the internal logic of the code and may not comprehensively validate the user experience or external interfaces. This requires additional testing methodologies to ensure a holistic approach.
Conclusion
White box testing is one of the many types of software testing. It allows a thorough look into how the software works internally. By using this approach, software engineers can make sure their creations are strong, dependable, and secure. As technology keeps advancing, the importance of white box testing will remain significant in providing top-notch software products to meet the increasing needs of the digital world.